Posts
People may assume that having debt is sometimes stressful, but so is lending money to other people. Any loan involves some measure of risk to both parties, and that is why credit providers put so much emphasis on the assessment of those who apply to them, and also on the decision to approve or reject an application. The task of lenders is made easier by the use of credit data solutions.
Lenders are always interested in the financial history of the individual or company who applies to them. They need to determine how much debt the applicant already has, who issued it and for what reason. They also need to be sure that the applicant is a reliable payer. Do they have unpaid accounts? Have they had debt written off in the past? These are typical questions for finance houses to ask, even if they are described as offensive or unnecessary by the applicant.
The other side of the assessment is based on the verification procedure. Financial institutions need to confirm that people are who they say they are, work where they say they work and earn the stated income. This is not only about the applicant's ability to repay the debt but is also done for obvious security purposes.
This consumer information is referred to as credit data. As a matter of course, and legal requirement, personal details and other financial information are not openly available to the public. There are also applicants who will attempt to conceal their information from lenders. The latter therefore require a more trustworthy supply of such information.
There are organizations who retain and supply this data, on a paid basis. They are commonly known as credit bureaus and they are legally authorized to do so. They maintain databases of consumers and their histories in the industry. Lenders are permitted to purchase access to the data if applicants sign over that option to them. That is why such permission is requested on any application for a loan or other finance.
In deciding who to use to provide this information, financiers should take note of several points.
Firstly, the quality of the data. How extensive is it? Is it reliable? Bureau reports should give accurate dates and figures and also be prepared to inform their customers as to the sources of their information. There should not be errors as this can prejudice not only the lender's decision but also the consumer's ability to be approved for finance.
In connection with quality, one also has to mention integrity. How strong is the supplier's security system? How easily can a consumer change or delete their record? A data provider should be respected in the industry. They should not permit easy access to their database.
Third, how representative is the database? What share of the market does the data supplier cover? If a supplier does not have a large enough database, it cannot satisfy the enquiries of its clients on a regular basis.
People occasionally make negative comments about the credit bureaus. They try to portray them as an unnecessary obstruction to obtaining loans and other finance. But the fact is that the bureaus are indispensable in avoiding unpaid debt, thus ensuring that the industry stays sustainable.
Lenders are always interested in the financial history of the individual or company who applies to them. They need to determine how much debt the applicant already has, who issued it and for what reason. They also need to be sure that the applicant is a reliable payer. Do they have unpaid accounts? Have they had debt written off in the past? These are typical questions for finance houses to ask, even if they are described as offensive or unnecessary by the applicant.
The other side of the assessment is based on the verification procedure. Financial institutions need to confirm that people are who they say they are, work where they say they work and earn the stated income. This is not only about the applicant's ability to repay the debt but is also done for obvious security purposes.
This consumer information is referred to as credit data. As a matter of course, and legal requirement, personal details and other financial information are not openly available to the public. There are also applicants who will attempt to conceal their information from lenders. The latter therefore require a more trustworthy supply of such information.
There are organizations who retain and supply this data, on a paid basis. They are commonly known as credit bureaus and they are legally authorized to do so. They maintain databases of consumers and their histories in the industry. Lenders are permitted to purchase access to the data if applicants sign over that option to them. That is why such permission is requested on any application for a loan or other finance.
In deciding who to use to provide this information, financiers should take note of several points.
Firstly, the quality of the data. How extensive is it? Is it reliable? Bureau reports should give accurate dates and figures and also be prepared to inform their customers as to the sources of their information. There should not be errors as this can prejudice not only the lender's decision but also the consumer's ability to be approved for finance.
In connection with quality, one also has to mention integrity. How strong is the supplier's security system? How easily can a consumer change or delete their record? A data provider should be respected in the industry. They should not permit easy access to their database.
Third, how representative is the database? What share of the market does the data supplier cover? If a supplier does not have a large enough database, it cannot satisfy the enquiries of its clients on a regular basis.
People occasionally make negative comments about the credit bureaus. They try to portray them as an unnecessary obstruction to obtaining loans and other finance. But the fact is that the bureaus are indispensable in avoiding unpaid debt, thus ensuring that the industry stays sustainable.
No comments:
Post a Comment